Jim Wallace’s Dangerous Ideas

This morning, as part of the Festival of Dangerous Ideas, I saw Sydney Morning Herald senior writer David Marr up against the Australian Christian Lobby’s managing director Jim Wallace on the issue of whether gays and lesbians should be allowed in schools.

Wallace’s basic argument for the rights of Christian schools to discriminate on the basis that Christian parents had the right to bring up their kids in an environment that is to their own values at what have you. i.e. gay influences are a bad thing.

As discussion went along, the issue of same sex marriage came up, as it inevitably always does. Wallace said that the push from the “homosexual lobby” for same sex marriage came from a place of selfishness because marriage is about procreation, and that is not possible in same sex relationships, and therefore if children are brought into same sex marriages it will be selfish because it will deny a child a right to a mother/father component.

The difficulty with this argument is that the creation of all families will involve some form of selfishness.

Just take Wallace’s own argument about the need for Christian schools to be able to discriminate. When parents decide to raise their children as Christians, they are selfishly denying their child the right from birth to choose their own religion, and by sending them to a school that reinforces their own beliefs, they’re again denying their child a right to expand their view of the world to that outside of their strict view of Christianity.

And that’s without even mentioning the fact that if the child is gay, there’s a good chance that raising them in such a strict household that probably has a negative view on homosexuality will obviously have a detrimental effect on the child’s mental health. And sending them to a school that reinforces homophobia through policies that prevent gay staff from being out, and raise the possibility of expelling students who do come out can’t be much better either.

But that’s the parent’s choice. And it’s theirs to make.

So if Wallace’s only argument nowadays against the “homosexual lobby” and its “agenda” to push for marriage equality is the fact that it’s “selfish”, he probably should look at some of the lifestyle choices he’s selfishly imposing on children, too.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine

Budget Lock-up

As a politics nerd, I was so very excited to be included in the media lock-up for the 2011-2012 Federal Budget. It’s pretty much like Christmas.

The lock-up begins at 1:30pm, but you can line up from about midday, so this morning I timed my arrival for around 12:30. After I made my way up to Parliament, past the great hall at to the back past the entrances to the House of Representatives and the Senate I was greeted by a number of very official-looking Treasury officials who checked to make sure I was who I said I was.

There was no catering this year, they said, so I better have my own food. The budget cuts had started already and I wasn’t even in the lockup room yet!

Media get the documents a full six hours before Wayne Swan can announce all his “announceables” in Parliament that night, so naturally we’re not allowed to have communication with the outside world. My iPhone was quickly confiscated but thankfully after a short debate they let me keep my laptop once I assured them that it wasn’t going to be able to get a message out of the lockup rooms.

At about 1:20 the room began to crowd with journalists from all over and at 1:30 the doors flood open and everyone pushes in like its the boxing day sales at Myer. We’re each presented with a showbag of budget goodies, four budget papers, a number of glossy announcements and the Treasurers speech.

We’re then shuffled off to our individual rooms, which I recognised as the committee rooms I’d come to know and love from the various senate estimates and budget estimates hearings I’d streamed from the APH website for the past year.

The big publications like AAP, Fairfax and News Limited have rooms with massive desktops set up. Radio and TV crews set up all their equipment in the halls while the journos begin digesting the budget documents.

The room I was assigned turned out to be rather quiet with only about 10 other journos, worn out tables and what I can only describe as white plastic garden chairs for the journalists to sit on.

Outside in the hallway, desks are lined with department press releases related to the budget, while upstairs Treasury has laid out the budget statements for each portfolio. I gather these documents up as I move along  and what originally looked like a daunting amount of reading now just looked impossible.

Just as I was despairing over the sheer volume of reading I would have to do, another Treasury official popped up and offered the four budget papers in PDF form on a secure USB. Saviour! All the documents could now be easily flicked through and verified while I was writing.

I first went through all the press releases, as I figured they would give me the most obvious indicators of what the government wants to show off in the budget, before I figured out what they weren’t so proud of. I wasn’t feeling a lot of love for the IT. Press releases directed at each state and territory about the NBN contained no new information, and very little content was different except for the name of that particular state or territory.

After making my way through the budget papers, I found my stories (over at ZDNet.com.au) and wrote them up over the course of the next few hours.

The room was eerily quiet except for the sounds of journalists tapping away. Every so often an ABC radio journalist could be heard practicing their news bulletin from the corridor outside, or someone would pop in to ask someone about this that or the other funding initiative.

At around 4pm, Wayne Swan held a press conference for the captive journalists upstairs. I have to admit I missed this because I was busy writing. When it came time for a break, I decided to wander around and stretch my legs a bit.

All the TV talent were getting prepared for their live crosses after 7:30. A make up chair was set up in one corner with a girl attending to a patient Leigh Sales. Glenn Milne (who I was seated next to incidentally) and Laurie Oakes share a handshake in the hall, while David Koch films a segment inside the lock-up no doubt for some Sunrise segment the next day.

Finally as the clock nears the 7:30 mark, the bells sound for MPs to assemble in the House of Representatives for the Treasurer to deliver his Budget speech. Exhausted journalists file out from their rooms to the entrance to wait for Wayne Swan to stand so they can finally be free. TV journalists are all prettied up for their TV appearances and online journalists, like me, have their laptops in hand ready to file as soon as the doors open.

As Swan stands up to deliver his fourth budget speech we all file out,  I find my iPhone and race outside into the freezing Canberra autumn night to file my stories from the steps of Parliament.

Lock-up is like nothing else I have ever experienced before.  As a new journalist being amongst the likes of the veterans of the Canberra Press Gallery, there’s just no comparison.

I wonder how long the phenomenon of the lock-up will last, however. Much of the funding in the budget had already been announced by the government in the last two weeks. And the block on telecommunications seems relatively archaic.  In a time where we’re used to tweeting every piece of new information we’re given, when the death of Osama Bin Laden is announced on Twitter before the US President can take to the podium, to be given massive amounts of information about millions of dollars in government spending and cuts and not being able to tell anyone about it for six hours is probably the cruelest thing you can ever do to a journalist.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine

Investigative Journalism

This week’s Law Report podcast is a must-listen for all journalists.

It’s a discussion between veteran journos Paul Barry (of Media Watch fame) and Chris Masters (of Four Corners, and Jonestown fame) on the perils of investigative reporting, defamation laws and being sued. Below are the parts that stood out for me the most:

Chris Masters: all journalists should be investigative, but most aren’t.

In my six months of being a full time journalist, I’ve touched briefly on investigative journalism but being a daily journalist whose publication is online exclusively, there’s not as much time for it. I’d love to have time to do a three month investigation such as what Masters did for the Moonlight saga.

Chris Masters: There’s another side to it however, and that is that my experience certainly is that for every decent, honourable whistleblower, there’s been another nine or ten who have been vexatious time wasters, and so this is an important grading process, where some people just simply want to embroil in their own obsession and validate what becomes a life’s mission for them. So we have to be sceptical about everything and everybody, and whistleblowers included.

Never a truer word spoken.

Chris Masters: I have to say I had made a mistake, and I’ve made plenty of mistakes throughout my course, I’ll bet you plenty of people in this room, have too. You can’t do this work in a mistake-free way

I’ve studied the regulation of the media subject at university as part of my training. We’re taught the dos and donts of journalism, the law, the regulation, the ethical guidelines of it but I really wish they would teach you that you will make mistakes. Most of the time they’ll be easily corrected and won’t lead to what Masters had to go through but when you’re just starting out, every minor mistake is a traumatic experience.

That’s the piece of advice I’d give new journalism students now: It’s okay to fuck up, and you definitely will… Just don’t fuck up too badly.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine

The break in transmission

I had intended on keeping this updated but I’m now two months into being a really real journalist for business technology website ZDNet. As such I haven’t been sure if I would be able to write much in this.

However, provided I’m not writing stuff that is related to business technology (i.e. no filter, no NBN, no Conroy, no iPads), it should be fine for me to keep this going. So I intend to begin tracking the upcoming Australian Federal election, and other random things that are not at all related to my day job.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine

Tony Abbott’s Gay Threat

On 60 Minutes on Sunday, Opposition leader Tony Abbott was questioned on his position on homosexuality, with the following response:

LIZ HAYES: Homosexuality? How do you feel about that?

TONY ABBOTT: I’d probably I feel a bit threatened…

LIZ HAYES: I’m not asking if it’s a personal choice of yours.

TONY ABBOTT: ..as so many people.

LIZ HAYES: When you say ‘threatened’?

TONY ABBOTT: Again, Liz, look, it’s a fact of life and I try to treat people as people and not put them in pigeonholes.

It was a strange choice of words. It’s not clear whether he went further into what he meant, whether he was threatened by gay issues as the alternative leader of the country given his well-known views or whether this was simply a “backs against the walls, fellas” response to homosexuality in general from the Mad Monk.

He was asked about those comments on Lateline last night:

LEIGH SALES: On the 60 Minutes program last night Liz Hayes asked you how you felt about homosexuality and you said you’d probably feel a bit threatened, as so many people do. What did you mean?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, it was a spontaneous answer, but the truth is I try to take people as I find them. I’ve always tried to be that way and I hope as I get older I become better at it.

LEIGH SALES: But, I just – I didn’t understand when I was watching the program what the word “threatened” meant, though. Were you making a joke that you feel threatened that men hit onto you, or that you feel that traditional families are threatened? What was “threatened” referring to?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, there is no doubt that it challenges, if you like, orthodox notions of the right order of things, but as I also said on the program, it happens, it’s a fact of life and we have to treat people as we find them.

“Orthodox notions of the right order of things”? Being gay isn’t like getting an ear piercing or a tattoo that your parents disapprove of, Tony.

He seems to now be backpedalling and his wording has become increasingly confusing and obfuscating but it still seems he is at least unsettled by homosexuality.

There’s that old trope that straight men feel threatened by gay guys as though by even being in the same room as a gay guy, we will obviously want to sleep with you, or try to convert you. It’s one of those annoyingly schoolboy homophobic responses one generally encounters when they first come out.

Or there’s Andrew Bolt’s back-handed defense that somehow wearing speedos perpetuating the stereotype of a “predatory gay with foolish and irresponsible displays like those so often seen in the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras” will somehow emasculate all straight men. But gay men are okay, so long as they make music he likes.

Tony, we don’t find you appealling and we certainly don’t want to convert you. And the speedos thing? You started it.

And trust me, that sort of frightening imagery is probably doing more to convert homosexual men to the straight and narrow than you could ever dream of.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine

Some things I liked

I’ve noticed that in these links I have a tendency to focus on US-based politics news more often than not. The last few weeks this could be forgiven as Australian politics was just getting up and going again. Parliament was sitting again, we had all the ABC shows we know and love back, including the PM on Q&A with, from what I could tell, were a bunch of Young Liberal and Young Labor kids where the questions veered from Dorothy Dixers, to preppy school kid “why can’t I get what I want?” type questions. And apart from that not much happened. I think these two stories are ripening but I don’t think we will see the full fruition of them for a little while yet.

Oh and we did see the illustrious denier-in-chief Lord Monckton debate climate scientist Tim Lambert with supervision by Alan Jones (gee, that sounds fair). Lambert was calm, well reasoned and performed well. It’s just a pity the crowd was full of one world government conspiracy theory nuts.

Climategate Revisited

One of the biggest non-controversy controversies last year was Climategate. This article brings us up to date on exactly how little it actually means and also how those who seek to dismiss climate change as not being influenced by man use ignorance to their advantage in making this case.

The common factor I tend to notice in climate change deniers is that they exhibit the same closed-mindedness they say so-called “warmists” have when presented with evidence that contradicts their own proofs. Despite Monckton’s entire argument being ripped to shreds by so many many different scientists and journalists, he’s still seen by these people as the second coming. And the coverage these people get is way over the top, and yet they still scream they have not been given the time to air their views. The current Doctor Media Watch host Jonathan Holmes covered it best here.

Fruit and Loins

It really disturbs me how much the Australian governments (state and Federal) listen to the Australian Christian Lobby. The ACL’s Jim Wallace was consulted by Stephen Conroy shortly before the release of the findings on the internet filter plan but Conroy also refused to meet with opposing groups. I’m not entirely sure how Wallace’s group can claim to represent anything other than an extreme right-wing fringe of the Christian faith and still claim to represent all Christians.

The Queensland Government addressed the issue of surrogacy for same-sex couples this week, so it was only natural that Wallace have a word. According to the World of Wallace, straight parent environments are the only safe, and stable environment for children to be raised. Pity about all that anecdotal evidence otherwise.

Aco*kalypse Now: Fear of the Gay Penis

The theory that gay men would join the army just on the off-chance of seeing a bit of straight guy penis is absolutely absurd, and borders on a gay panic defense. Here’s a hint guys: chances are, if you’re straight, gay guys don’t find you attractive. And, as the video points out, clearly nothing says “lets have gay sex” like getting shot at in Afghanistan.

CBS: Support for Gays in the Military Depends on the Question

A poll out this week from CBS shows that more people in the US are in favour of “gay men and lesbians” serving in the military than “homosexuals” serving in the military. It’s an interesting case in semantics, though I wish it had been more broad to encompass other reclaimed words like the all-encompassing “queer” or the F word. The pure clinical nature of “homosexual” draws back on 50s style fear campaigns, while gay and lesbian is so desensitised.

Fox News Tea Party Survey Fail

I’m not sure this is totally a fail if they put this as an option in the first place but it’s amusing that the result is even higher after all the attention. Especially considering that they managed to get a slight jab at them removed from a Captain America comic.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine

Some Things I Liked

Adult Entertainment Highlight of Sydney Newscast

As the first Australian internet meme of 2010, this really showed just how far we’ve come with these sorts of viral videos. This ill-fated Channel 7 cross to Macquarie Bank’s finance studio aired at 2:30pm, shortly after the Australian Reserve Bank had decided to keep interest rates on hold. Within a matter of an hour (if that) someone had caught frames of it, spread it via Twitter and the blogosphere and there was a poor quality video up on YouTube shortly after.

And showing how much more clued in TV news and mainstream media outlets are, both the 7PM Project and A Current Affair reveled in the schadenfreude of the clip on their shows that evening. By the next day radio and the papers had caught up. discussing whether or not this was acceptable behaviour, and in one case, highlighting that the photos (Miranda Kerr from her GQ shoot, I imagine they both love the publicity) were aimed squarely at bankers. And it also went international.

As “Dave the Banker” is keeping his job, this meme will be dead next week. As far as Australian memes go, given the previous top two were Corey Worthington and the Chk-Chk Boom girl, you’ve come a long way baby.

National Party Counting

Ahh Barnaby “Barnyard” Joyce. The accountant turned politician who pretends to be a farmer who pretends to be a Shadow Finance Minister. Oh wait, he actually is. One of the more lulz worthy appointments in the Tony Abbott shadow cabinet (and there were a few) was  Joyce to the portfolio of Shadow Finance.

This clip of the shadow minister at the National Press Club this week shows either a failed attempt by Joyce to mislead people on basic spending numbers or an incompetant politician who left his abacus at home. You decide.

Happy Birthday, Minister

I have to admit, when Yes, Minister was on the ABC when I was a kid and my parents would watch it, I would beg them to switch to The Simpsons because I didn’t get it. Now, after 30 years, it is clearly one of a growing number of British sitcoms that remain funny no matter how many times you watch it (Blackadder and Fawlty Towers being the top two).

Why Aren’t Conservatives Funny?

Apart from PJ O’Rourke, I struggle to think of any well-known conservative who is funny, so this piece is totally on the money. You only have to look at the sparring match between Bill O’Reilly and Jon Stewart this week to see a perfect example of this. Stewart is intelligent, self-deprecating and goddamn hilarious. On the other hand, O’Reilly tries really hard to be funny and comes off as condescending, bullying and really kinda lame.

PART 1 | PART 2

I’ve been trying to think of comedians who are conservative or conservatives who are funny in Australia and I really can’t think of a single example. Gerard Henderson, Miranda Devine, Andrew Bolt, they’re all just so angry and take themselves too seriously.

On the other hand, on the extremely unfunny left we have Catherine Deveny. Who by all accounts I should like and find but I find her columns like fingernails down a chalkboard as she discusses which bogans she doesn’t like this week.

Sex in the time of GPS

Grindr is one of the more interesting uses of the iPhone and its GPS capabilities. Trust the gays to think of it. I’ve yet to see much of Grindr covered in the press in Australia but I’m thinking it’s only a matter of time before some sort of moral panic comes out about the GPS semi-stalking capabilities, or just the fact that “OMG gays close to us might be having sex!”.

Westboro Baptist Church Protests Outside Twitter

Not much to add to this, I just love the counter-protest signs.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine

Some things I liked – iPad-free edition

The less said about Apple’s new thingy the better. It’s not that I’m dying for one or that I wish to put it in a blender, as that guy did that one time with the iPhone, there has just been a lot of media saturation for a product that really isn’t that exciting. As a friend put it, I’d be excited if it had a LCARS OS.

Charlie Brooker – How to Report the News

The boring intros with establishing shot, the awkward cutaways to hide editing flaws, voxpopping and the cliche ending; it’s my Video Journalism class all over again! I’d like to say I’m kidding but this is exactly how they taught us to make news for TV. Don’t go breaking that mould.

Scientists, the IPCC wants you

I find the rabble-rousing on News Limited blogs, in particular Herald Sun’s resident “expert” on the environment, Andrew Bolt’s to be particularly infuriating. My resolution this year is to only visit the site once a week, lest I have a stroke. Thankfully the boys at Pure Poison keep me up to date most of the time. I’ve only ever heard of a couple of people who have felt the wrath of angered Bolt readers (Former Media Watch host David Marr, who received homophobic threats after being “rude” to Bolt on Insiders, and UOW lecturer Jason Wilson, who has a very punchable face, apparently after this piece on Bolt at New Matilda) but reading how Bolt readers treat scientists who Bolt has deemed to be part of the Great Climate Change conspiracy is another thing entirely.

As the man himself so often puts it – What is it with the [Right] and violence?

Bunch of Phonies Mourn J.D. Salinger

I seriously <3 The Onion. And I think even Holden would be pleased with their obit effort. Many have tried to capture Holden’s voice before, but this one is the best I’ve seen in a while and it makes me wonder if The Onion had the obit prepared for a while, in the same morbid fashion TV news programs prepare showreels in advance in case people die (The Richard Wilkins/Jeff Goldblum incident springs to mind).

Research Shows Two Gay Parents Better Than A Single Straight One [well duh]

I’m of two minds about this. There is nothing wrong with single parents, and I don’t think equality should be gained in any way by pointing out that one type of family is better than another (that’s kinda what we should be fighting against, right?) but it is nice to have research to back what people have been saying quite a while: kids adapt to their environment and two gay parents? Not such a bad one.

Multiplexity

Tony Martin is by far my favourite comedian, and I’ve followed his work ever since I first snuck a few laughs at the Bargearse VHS at a friend’s place in Year 7. His column on films and cinema etiquette is Tony in his film geek element.

“‘Still, rather that than fucking Avatar,’ he added, pronouncing the ‘Ava’ to rhyme with ‘raver’, momentarily creating, in my mind, an image of Sam Worthington spending an entire movie operating a virtual Ava Gardner.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • blogmarks
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine