Tony Abbott’s Gay Threat

On 60 Minutes on Sunday, Opposition leader Tony Abbott was questioned on his position on homosexuality, with the following response:

LIZ HAYES: Homosexuality? How do you feel about that?

TONY ABBOTT: I’d probably I feel a bit threatened…

LIZ HAYES: I’m not asking if it’s a personal choice of yours.

TONY ABBOTT: ..as so many people.

LIZ HAYES: When you say ‘threatened’?

TONY ABBOTT: Again, Liz, look, it’s a fact of life and I try to treat people as people and not put them in pigeonholes.

It was a strange choice of words. It’s not clear whether he went further into what he meant, whether he was threatened by gay issues as the alternative leader of the country given his well-known views or whether this was simply a “backs against the walls, fellas” response to homosexuality in general from the Mad Monk.

He was asked about those comments on Lateline last night:

LEIGH SALES: On the 60 Minutes program last night Liz Hayes asked you how you felt about homosexuality and you said you’d probably feel a bit threatened, as so many people do. What did you mean?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, it was a spontaneous answer, but the truth is I try to take people as I find them. I’ve always tried to be that way and I hope as I get older I become better at it.

LEIGH SALES: But, I just – I didn’t understand when I was watching the program what the word “threatened” meant, though. Were you making a joke that you feel threatened that men hit onto you, or that you feel that traditional families are threatened? What was “threatened” referring to?

TONY ABBOTT: Well, there is no doubt that it challenges, if you like, orthodox notions of the right order of things, but as I also said on the program, it happens, it’s a fact of life and we have to treat people as we find them.

“Orthodox notions of the right order of things”? Being gay isn’t like getting an ear piercing or a tattoo that your parents disapprove of, Tony.

He seems to now be backpedalling and his wording has become increasingly confusing and obfuscating but it still seems he is at least unsettled by homosexuality.

There’s that old trope that straight men feel threatened by gay guys as though by even being in the same room as a gay guy, we will obviously want to sleep with you, or try to convert you. It’s one of those annoyingly schoolboy homophobic responses one generally encounters when they first come out.

Or there’s Andrew Bolt’s back-handed defense that somehow wearing speedos perpetuating the stereotype of a “predatory gay with foolish and irresponsible displays like those so often seen in the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras” will somehow emasculate all straight men. But gay men are okay, so long as they make music he likes.

Tony, we don’t find you appealling and we certainly don’t want to convert you. And the speedos thing? You started it.

And trust me, that sort of frightening imagery is probably doing more to convert homosexual men to the straight and narrow than you could ever dream of.

Steve Fielding, Kyle Sandilands and the everydayman

Yes, this is yet another internet blog talking about Kyle Sandilands and Steve Fielding. The combined two have dominated blogs, Twitter and oh yeah, the news for the past 24 hours.

Much was made of Fielding’s latest gaffe where he criticised Kevin Rudd’s ‘physical’ policy and then corrected himself by spelling  it out as F-I-S-K-A-L. Fielding later came out and attempted to handwave it all by saying he had a learning disability. Naturally this led to the likes of Penbo at The Punch and Miranda Devine claiming it was brutal intellectual elitism at play and bizarrely, for Ms Devine, because Fielding is a climate change “agnostic”.

The Sandilands story barely needs rehashing. Kyle does something Kyle-like, journos listening to everything Kyle says for any sort of controversy, strike for gold and raise the rabble-rousers.  mUmBRELLA did an excellent analysis of where Kyle is now and what his future potentially holds.

The thing that struck me about both these incidents, besides the blatant attention-seeking from both involved, is that the anti-intellectualism audience that the likes of Devine and Penbo play to in defending Fielding, is exactly the sort of people that give 2DAY FM and Kyle Sandilands hit ratings (if not the sponsors).

Jason Whittaker’s  post today nailed it in highlighting the problems of this kind of anti-elitism that is the oh-so-common defence used by conservatives in defending one of their own. And something that seems to be, depressingly, standard fare in politics today. Politicians must be seen to be the everyday man, and intellectualism equated to latte-sipping elitism.

I think the epitomy of my realisation of this was seeing Kevin Rudd’s tweet today about Jarryd Haynes [sic] and the Dally M awards. Kev wouldn’t give a toss about rugby league but there’s that popularist everyday man  back again. I long for the days when we had a Prime Minister who wasn’t afraid to admit his love for the Opera, even if he did have to sit awkwardly through a rugby match or two.

But perhaps in this culture of, let’s face it, appealing to the lowest common denominator (Fielding is good at maths), politicians and the media are creating the kinds of audiences who switch off from the real news and would prefer to listen to a radio shock jock jack off on-air, question a 14 year old girl about her sex life, or make off-colour holocaust jokes. Shouldn’t we praise intelligence and encourage people seeking higher office have qualities far beyond their ability to eat a meat pie and hold some sort of tinny record with their mates?

Encouraging Kyle’s style of radio, as Austereo does, to the tune of constant ratings wins is no different to defending a man who holds a critical vote on legislation in the senate but can’t spell fiscal.

* let’s get Muphry’s Law out of the way and say there’s bound to be at least one spelling error in this article
* I blame too much West Wing for my idealistic view of intelligence and politics going hand in hand at the moment.

The Blog Wars

It’s been interesting watching the looming battle between News Limited mouthpieces Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair and Crikey’s new blog Pure Poison

I was always a big fan of Boltwatch because Andrew Bolt’s free reign of deceptions is something that should be challenged. SoI’ve been following their new blog from the very beginning. It started off well with a few keen insights into why people like Bolt and Piers Akerman are often guilty of the very misinformation they often criticise the Left for. However, once Bolt began subtley (I say subtle because he refused to link to the blog) accusing Pure Poison of writing outright racist comments on his blog in an attempt to vilify him, it went a bit downhill from there. It has become a bit of a “he said she said” game over the blogs.

I see that Pure Poison have made a couple of posts since sticking to the original aim of the blog, I hope they keep this up and it doesn’t dissolve into just petty in-fighting. As much as I think Andrew would like it, I hope you guys don’t stoop to it.

In the mean time, I , like a growing number of people I know, consider Google Reader an essential part of my day. And it has a permanent slot in my Firefox tabs. So if you have any interesting media related blogs you think I should be reading, please comment and let me know, I’ll look into them and link to them from this site too, if they take my fancy.

Bushfires part 2

In the past few days, we’ve also seen a number of the commentators using the fires to get a free kick in for their ideological positions. Miranda Devine and Andrew Bolt have used this both as a time to paint the environmentally friendly and those who do believe in climate change, which is frankly, most of us, as uncaring bastards trying to gain attention at a time of national tragedy while at the same time claiming it is green policies that lead to the fires.

They’re happy to put the foot in when it suits them but if anyone argues differently, ‘it’s not the time’ to argue about this.

Not to mention 2GB’s Chris Smith, 2SM’s Grant Goldman and Fox News, among others, have all tried to blame the fires on Islamic terrorists.

In the meantime, the police today have arrested two people in relation to some of these fires. Lets hope the media, desperate for someone to blame, will remember the rule that they are ‘innocent until proven guilty’.

The difference a word makes

Activists descended on Canberra to protest the ongoing Northern Territory intervention. The Sydney Morning Herald via AAP writes:

The protest was over the federal government intervention into Northern Territory Aboriginal communities in response to harrowing claims of widespread child sex abuse.

My issue here is the encroachment of editorial comment into news reporting. It may just be me, but I feel the use of ‘harrowing’ betrays the authors own views – something journalists are supposed to steer clear of when presenting news. Read more…

Obama Fever

Obama - can he save the world?

Obama - can he save the world?

Inauguration coverage had been fairly interesting this time round. Obama has been painted as president and saviour of the world by a number of news outlets.

I know America is a powerful country, but does the media really need to remind them of this fact? And while we were busy celebrating the new king of everything, what exactly were our own politicians getting up to? You know, the people we actually elected to run the place…